LEVICK | April 29th, 2016
The New European Union Market Abuse Regulation

The following is a memo from Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz on April 28, 2016.
Two months from now, on July 3, 2016, the new European Union Market Abuse Regulation (“MARâ€), addressing insider trading, disclosure of inside information, and market manipulation, will come into effect. The new rules will repeal and replace the current EU Market Abuse Directive (“MADâ€). Unlike the MAD, which set minimum standards for market abuse regulations that EU member countries were required to satisfy through national laws, the new MAR will directly apply throughout the EU by its own force and replace existing national market abuse regulations.
For the most part, the substantive rules under the MAR will mirror the preexisting rules un- der the MAD. In particular, the definitions relating to insider trading and market abuse, as well as the duties of issuers promptly to disclose inside information and avoid selective disclosure, largely remain the same. Several changes, however, have important implications for European issuers and investment firms and their employees.
Most notably, the MAR has an expanded scope. While the MAD applies only to financial instruments trading on regulated markets and derivatives based on such instruments, the MAR will also apply to financial instruments trading on multilateral trading facilities and organized trading facilities and to related derivatives. Further, under the MAR, market manipulation rules will apply to certain commodities contracts and benchmarks, such as LIBOR.
The MAR will also add several new requirements for covered issuers, including requiring issuers to create and maintain records evidencing compliance with rules for delaying disclosure of inside information and for disclosure of inside information as part of a market sounding, as well as expanded and more detailed rules for the creation of lists of individuals possessing inside infor- mation. For covered issuers, the MAR will expand the MAD™’s requirements for disclosing transac- tions by certain insiders and will introduce closed periods during which such insiders generally may not trade in the issuer™’s shares or debt or related derivatives. Importantly, the MAR™’s closed peri- ods differ from the closed periods existing under some countries’ current law, such as those of the United Kingdom.
In addition, the MAR makes several changes intended to aid enforcement of market abuse rules. While the MAD required professionals arranging and executing transactions to report any suspicious transactions, the MAR will also require such professionals to report suspicious orders and to maintain effective systems to detect suspicious orders and transactions. In part to reduce the necessary burden of proof for market manipulation, the MAR will add the offense of attempted market manipulation, which does not require proof of an actual impact on the market. And to in- crease deterrence, the MAR will create minimum remedies and maximum penalties that all coun- tries must have available as part of their enforcement regimes.
As the MAR demonstrates, market abuse remains a major focus for European regulators, and market abuse rules remain an important part of doing business in Europe. Affected companies – including investment banks, investment advisors, and issuers trading on European markets – should review their compliance policies and procedures, and consider adopting any revisions or im- plementing new systems and mechanisms, in order to ensure that they bring themselves into timely and effective compliance with these impending changes.
LEVICK | April 29th, 2016
The New European Union Market Abuse Regulation

The following is a memo from Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz on April 28, 2016.
Two months from now, on July 3, 2016, the new European Union Market Abuse Regulation (“MARâ€), addressing insider trading, disclosure of inside information, and market manipulation, will come into effect. The new rules will repeal and replace the current EU Market Abuse Directive (“MADâ€). Unlike the MAD, which set minimum standards for market abuse regulations that EU member countries were required to satisfy through national laws, the new MAR will directly apply throughout the EU by its own force and replace existing national market abuse regulations.
For the most part, the substantive rules under the MAR will mirror the preexisting rules un- der the MAD. In particular, the definitions relating to insider trading and market abuse, as well as the duties of issuers promptly to disclose inside information and avoid selective disclosure, largely remain the same. Several changes, however, have important implications for European issuers and investment firms and their employees.
Most notably, the MAR has an expanded scope. While the MAD applies only to financial instruments trading on regulated markets and derivatives based on such instruments, the MAR will also apply to financial instruments trading on multilateral trading facilities and organized trading facilities and to related derivatives. Further, under the MAR, market manipulation rules will apply to certain commodities contracts and benchmarks, such as LIBOR.
The MAR will also add several new requirements for covered issuers, including requiring issuers to create and maintain records evidencing compliance with rules for delaying disclosure of inside information and for disclosure of inside information as part of a market sounding, as well as expanded and more detailed rules for the creation of lists of individuals possessing inside infor- mation. For covered issuers, the MAR will expand the MAD™’s requirements for disclosing transac- tions by certain insiders and will introduce closed periods during which such insiders generally may not trade in the issuer™’s shares or debt or related derivatives. Importantly, the MAR™’s closed peri- ods differ from the closed periods existing under some countries’ current law, such as those of the United Kingdom.
In addition, the MAR makes several changes intended to aid enforcement of market abuse rules. While the MAD required professionals arranging and executing transactions to report any suspicious transactions, the MAR will also require such professionals to report suspicious orders and to maintain effective systems to detect suspicious orders and transactions. In part to reduce the necessary burden of proof for market manipulation, the MAR will add the offense of attempted market manipulation, which does not require proof of an actual impact on the market. And to in- crease deterrence, the MAR will create minimum remedies and maximum penalties that all coun- tries must have available as part of their enforcement regimes.
As the MAR demonstrates, market abuse remains a major focus for European regulators, and market abuse rules remain an important part of doing business in Europe. Affected companies – including investment banks, investment advisors, and issuers trading on European markets – should review their compliance policies and procedures, and consider adopting any revisions or im- plementing new systems and mechanisms, in order to ensure that they bring themselves into timely and effective compliance with these impending changes.
- Brand
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- Here We Come
- Corporate Revolt Over Campaign Donations Shakes Political World
- What Happens Next?
- CSR & Sustainability
- Public Perception & the Biden Transition
- WATCH: Reputation Management with PRSA
- Over the River and Through The Woods
- Why Non-Profits are so Vulnerable to Crisis Risk
- The Threat to Free Markets
- What Happens When Nonprofits Get Caught In The Klieg Lights?
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Communications
- “Crooked Dominion Machines,” Impeachments, Insurrections & The First 100 Days
- Reflections on a Turbulent Year: 2020
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- Here We Come
- The Ministry of Common Sense
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- What Happens Next?
- CSR & Sustainability
- A Conversation with Abbe Lowell
- A New Year’s Resolution
- Public Perception & the Biden Transition
- WATCH: Reputation Management with PRSA
- Company News
- Reflections on a Turbulent Year: 2020
- Here We Come
- Recent Awards & Recognition
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- What’s a Director to Do?
- LEVICK Announces Partnership with BCG
- A New Look
- Albert Krieger, 1923-2020
- LEVICK Announces Partnership with Jipyong
- Speaking to In-House Counsel
- Childhood Lessons
- LEVICK Announces New Webinar Series with Turbine Labs
- Crisis
- “Crooked Dominion Machines,” Impeachments, Insurrections & The First 100 Days
- Reflections on a Turbulent Year: 2020
- 3 Tech Lessons Businesses Must Learn From COVID-19
- Trump’s pardons undercut a decade of foreign lobbying law enforcement. What now?
- Fighting for the Rule of Law with Marshall Harris
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- What to expect as the clock approaches midnight
- How to Stop the Madness
- Corporate Revolt Over Campaign Donations Shakes Political World
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- No ‘justice’ in rep’s vote
- A Call for Orderly & Peaceful Transition of Power
- Finance
- Here We Come
- The Threat to Free Markets
- Advisory & Insurance Services
- WATCH: Revolutionizing Litigation Finance
- Litigation Finance: Revolutionizing Litigation
- Consumer-Focused Solutions for Financial Health
- Event: Consumer-Focused Solutions for Financial Health
- Sports: Power and Money in a New Age of Social Justice
- The Balancing Act: The Role of Whistleblowers in American Commerce and Government
- The Evolving and More Powerful FARA
- FCPA & Compliance in a Time of Uncertainty
- Shareholders vs. Stakeholders: Is the Paradigm Shifting?
- Guest Column
- Guest Blog: The Mainstream Media Gets an A for Intellectual Arrogance, an F for Journalism
- Buckle up Directors: Cybersecurity Risk and Bankruptcy Risk Are Not Mutually Exclusive
- Buckle up Directors: Cybersecurity Risk and Bankruptcy Risk Are Not Mutually Exclusive
- South Africa: The Slow Decline of the ANC
- Why CSR Fails and How to Fix It
- What to Expect Following the European Elections?
- Buhari Inaugurated. What Now for Nigeria?
- Marketing- It’s Up To You…
- Crisis Management lessons from the air-crash investigation model
- The Future of War
- Health
- Reflections on a Turbulent Year: 2020
- Food Issues & the Biden Administration
- Covid-19: The Pandemic that Never Should Have Happened
- Pharma’s Post-Pandemic Policy Outlook
- Keeping Hope Alive
- Real Herd Immunity
- The Fiction of College Sports Amateurism
- Mac Summit: Crisis Communications in a Post-Covid, Post-Election World
- Travel Industry Communications in the Age of Covid-19
- Track of Time
- Is C-19 Taking Women Lawyers’ Careers Back to the 1950s?
- Post-Pandemic PR Strategy
- In Memoriam
- Snider’s Super Foods: Locally World Famous
- Speak Truth With Love, Not Anger
- In Memoriam: Stephen Susman
- Letter to the Movement
- John Lewis’ Life Bridged the Best of America
- Albert Krieger, 1923-2020
- In Memoriam of Marcia Horowitz
- Jim Lehrer Passes Away
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Harold Burson Passes Away
- Interviews
- CommPRO: Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s Life & Legacy
- Richard Levick on “My Wakeup Call”
- Primerus Webinar: Into the Wind
- The Future of Baseball Post-Pandemic
- Webinar: The End of Brand Neutrality
- Thought Leadership & Organic Growth
- Man & Superman
- LEVICK Announces New Webinar Series with Turbine Labs
- Navigating Coronavirus Challenges in the Insurance Industry
- VIDEO: How to Anticipate & Avoid a Crisis
- What’s Next? with Julie Chase
- What’s Next?: California Electoral Behavior
- Law Firms
- Fighting for the Rule of Law with Marshall Harris
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Beyond Black Swan: Positioning the law firm for the new normal
- A Salute to Personal Courage and the Rule of Law
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- When a client becomes a law firm’s PR nightmare
- The General Counsel’s Dilemma
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- The Latest Top Class Actions
- Trust on Trial: How Communicators Succeed in a World No Longer Trusted
- The Latest Settlements, Class actions, Investigations & More
- Litigation
- Fighting for the Rule of Law with Marshall Harris
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- A Conversation with Abbe Lowell
- Leveraging Legal Expertise in Communications
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Beyond Black Swan: Positioning the law firm for the new normal
- A Salute to Personal Courage and the Rule of Law
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- When a client becomes a law firm’s PR nightmare
- The General Counsel’s Dilemma
- WATCH: Revolutionizing Litigation Finance
- Litigation Finance: Revolutionizing Litigation
- Our Work
- Recent Awards & Recognition
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- Crisis Communications & The Age of Cancel Culture
- Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
- Video: Conversations with American Legends
- Staying Ahead of the Crisis
- A New Era of Insurance Marketing
- Infographic: Judgment Free Zone
- Infographic: Barriers to Entry
- Infographic: History Meter
- Assistance for Law Firms Engaged in Pro Bono
- Webinar: The End of Brand Neutrality
- Public Affairs
- “Crooked Dominion Machines,” Impeachments, Insurrections & The First 100 Days
- Trump’s pardons undercut a decade of foreign lobbying law enforcement. What now?
- Fighting for the Rule of Law with Marshall Harris
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- What to expect as the clock approaches midnight
- How to Stop the Madness
- Corporate Revolt Over Campaign Donations Shakes Political World
- No ‘justice’ in rep’s vote
- A Call for Orderly & Peaceful Transition of Power
- Recovering from the Greatest Sacrifice
- Food Issues & the Biden Administration
- The Cost of Government Regulation and the Threat to Free Enterprise
- Risk
- Ingredients of Decency
- ESG Performance and Credit Markets
- The Coronavirus Saga is Just Beginning
- No. 1 Risk of the Decade
- The Risk Evolution of Corporate Risk
- Extend Risk Management Reach
- Collective Action
- Risk Identifying Software
- The New Risk of Doing Nothing
- Political Unrest In Hong Kong
- High-Profile Kidnaps in African National Parks
- Cyber Resilience
- Social
- The Ministry of Common Sense
- How to Stop the Madness
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- No ‘justice’ in rep’s vote
- A Call for Orderly & Peaceful Transition of Power
- Recovering from the Greatest Sacrifice
- CSR & Sustainability
- A New Year’s Resolution
- Dropping the Mic
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- Crisis, Covid, DEI & the Election
- MLK’s Memphis Address
- Technology
- 3 Tech Lessons Businesses Must Learn From COVID-19
- Constella Intelligence Announces Hunter for Improved Investigation Capability
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- Digital Politics: The Future of Voting Technology
- Ethics in Electronics
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- The Pause
- Cybersecurity Incidents of the Summer
- The Changing Digital Economy and Cyber Risks
- The Future of U.S. Manufacturing
- Tech CEO Summer Superbowl hearing
- This Week
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- A New Year’s Resolution
- Over the River and Through The Woods
- Dropping the Mic
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- What We Hear
- Track of Time
- Video: Conversations with American Legends
- Conversations with American Legends
- A New Era of Insurance Marketing
- American Legend