Alexander Lange, Esq. | October 7th, 2016
Neutral Experts: Powerful Tools for Litigation Communicators

Earlier this year, renowned judge and legal scholar Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit published a two-part article in the legal journal, The Green Bag, entitled “What Is Obviously Wrong With the Federal Judiciary, Yet Eminently Curable.” In part I of this article Judge Posner made the case for federal judges to more regularly adopt the practice of appointing a neutral expert witness in trials involving complicated commercial and technological issues. This issue was brought back into the legal media cycle at the end of September when several federal judges, speaking at an event hosted by NYU Law’s Civil Jury Project, argued against this practice.
The idea of using a neutral court-appointed expert witness is not a new one. In fact, Judge Posner and others have been making this argument for over 20 years now, and Federal Rule of Evidence 706 specifically provides for it. Judge Posner argues that the practice has not caught on because the legal culture in the United States is too adversarial and views the judge as mainly an “arbiter of a contest – a drama, really – put on by the lawyers for the contending parties.†Proponents of the court-appointed expert argue that such an expert would serve to keep the “hired gun†experts of the parties honest before juries, and juries would be instructed that the neutral experts are not meant to be determinative.
However, judges opposing the practice worry that putting “neutral†experts in front of juries will taint the legal process as jurors could give extra weight to any expert the court has labeled as neutral, no matter what jury instruction is given. Whatever side the neutral expert falls on is given an unquestioned advantage over the other side. This may not seem like a problem to some; court-appointed experts are not hired guns, like attorneys’ experts, so their opinions should be given extra reverence. However, just because an expert is appointed by the court does not necessarily mean that they are free from bias or flawed methodologies, and regardless of whether an attorney is able to successfully call into question that expert™’s qualifications or the soundness of their theory, the expert will be somewhat protected by the fact that the court itself has appointed them.Â
This same principle applies in the litigation communications arena. Companies or individuals involved in high-profile litigation often want (or are forced) to make statements throughout litigation but especially at the end when some sort of resolution has been reached. The addition of a “neutral court-appointed expert™’s opinion†would be a powerful tool for those whose side the expert has fallen on. It would provide validation and support for favorable jury verdicts (which can be painted as unreliable) and could also be used as proof of a verdict™’s unreliability if a jury were to rule opposite of the neutral expert™’s opinion, giving parties that have lost in litigation some positive news to tout.Â
Only time will tell if Judge Posner™’s latest plea will result in any demonstrable increase in the appointment of neutral court-appointed experts, but if it does, litigation communicators will have a new tool in their toolbox to both use and defend against. Â
Alexander Lange, Esq. | October 7th, 2016
Neutral Experts: Powerful Tools for Litigation Communicators

Earlier this year, renowned judge and legal scholar Richard Posner of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit published a two-part article in the legal journal, The Green Bag, entitled “What Is Obviously Wrong With the Federal Judiciary, Yet Eminently Curable.” In part I of this article Judge Posner made the case for federal judges to more regularly adopt the practice of appointing a neutral expert witness in trials involving complicated commercial and technological issues. This issue was brought back into the legal media cycle at the end of September when several federal judges, speaking at an event hosted by NYU Law’s Civil Jury Project, argued against this practice.
The idea of using a neutral court-appointed expert witness is not a new one. In fact, Judge Posner and others have been making this argument for over 20 years now, and Federal Rule of Evidence 706 specifically provides for it. Judge Posner argues that the practice has not caught on because the legal culture in the United States is too adversarial and views the judge as mainly an “arbiter of a contest – a drama, really – put on by the lawyers for the contending parties.†Proponents of the court-appointed expert argue that such an expert would serve to keep the “hired gun†experts of the parties honest before juries, and juries would be instructed that the neutral experts are not meant to be determinative.
However, judges opposing the practice worry that putting “neutral†experts in front of juries will taint the legal process as jurors could give extra weight to any expert the court has labeled as neutral, no matter what jury instruction is given. Whatever side the neutral expert falls on is given an unquestioned advantage over the other side. This may not seem like a problem to some; court-appointed experts are not hired guns, like attorneys’ experts, so their opinions should be given extra reverence. However, just because an expert is appointed by the court does not necessarily mean that they are free from bias or flawed methodologies, and regardless of whether an attorney is able to successfully call into question that expert™’s qualifications or the soundness of their theory, the expert will be somewhat protected by the fact that the court itself has appointed them.Â
This same principle applies in the litigation communications arena. Companies or individuals involved in high-profile litigation often want (or are forced) to make statements throughout litigation but especially at the end when some sort of resolution has been reached. The addition of a “neutral court-appointed expert™’s opinion†would be a powerful tool for those whose side the expert has fallen on. It would provide validation and support for favorable jury verdicts (which can be painted as unreliable) and could also be used as proof of a verdict™’s unreliability if a jury were to rule opposite of the neutral expert™’s opinion, giving parties that have lost in litigation some positive news to tout.Â
Only time will tell if Judge Posner™’s latest plea will result in any demonstrable increase in the appointment of neutral court-appointed experts, but if it does, litigation communicators will have a new tool in their toolbox to both use and defend against. Â
- Brand
- Apology Mania Sweeps the Nation
- Risk Management in a Cancel Culture
- Amazing Grace
- Meet Nancy Pelosi
- Delta Airlines and the Georgia Voting Controversy
- Richard Levick on Volkswagen’s April Fool’s
- The Final Episode of M*A*S*H
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- Can Capitalism Really Be “For Humanity?”
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- Here We Come
- Corporate Revolt Over Campaign Donations Shakes Political World
- Communications
- Apology Mania Sweeps the Nation
- Risk Management in a Cancel Culture
- Amazing Grace
- Corporate Leadership in an Age of Unrest
- Ten Rules For Corporations And Social Issues
- Delta Airlines and the Georgia Voting Controversy
- Developing a Crisis Management Program
- “I Never Felt as Unsafe as I Did That Day”
- How America Scores Changes Youths Through Soccer and Poetry
- Everyone Gets Disrupted
- The Politics Industry
- Look
- Company News
- The Final Episode of M*A*S*H
- Reflections on a Turbulent Year: 2020
- Here We Come
- Recent Awards & Recognition
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- What’s a Director to Do?
- LEVICK Announces Partnership with BCG
- A New Look
- Albert Krieger, 1923-2020
- LEVICK Announces Partnership with Jipyong
- Speaking to In-House Counsel
- Childhood Lessons
- Crisis
- Apology Mania Sweeps the Nation
- Risk Management in a Cancel Culture
- Amazing Grace
- Corporate Leadership in an Age of Unrest
- Ten Rules For Corporations And Social Issues
- Meet Nancy Pelosi
- It’s War: The New Dilemma for Corporations and Social Issues
- Matt Gaetz’s Strategic Struggle Makes Him a Target
- Delta Airlines and the Georgia Voting Controversy
- A Call for Elected Officials to Protect Voting Access
- Richard Levick on Volkswagen’s April Fool’s
- Developing a Crisis Management Program
- Finance
- The World of Financial Crimes with Tom Ajamie
- Can Capitalism Really Be “For Humanity?”
- GameStop: The Buck Starts Here
- Here We Come
- The Threat to Free Markets
- Advisory & Insurance Services
- WATCH: Revolutionizing Litigation Finance
- Litigation Finance: Revolutionizing Litigation
- Consumer-Focused Solutions for Financial Health
- Event: Consumer-Focused Solutions for Financial Health
- Sports: Power and Money in a New Age of Social Justice
- The Balancing Act: The Role of Whistleblowers in American Commerce and Government
- Guest Column
- Guest Blog: The Mainstream Media Gets an A for Intellectual Arrogance, an F for Journalism
- Buckle up Directors: Cybersecurity Risk and Bankruptcy Risk Are Not Mutually Exclusive
- Buckle up Directors: Cybersecurity Risk and Bankruptcy Risk Are Not Mutually Exclusive
- South Africa: The Slow Decline of the ANC
- Why CSR Fails and How to Fix It
- What to Expect Following the European Elections?
- Buhari Inaugurated. What Now for Nigeria?
- Marketing- It’s Up To You…
- Crisis Management lessons from the air-crash investigation model
- The Future of War
- Health
- Reflections on a Turbulent Year: 2020
- Food Issues & the Biden Administration
- Covid-19: The Pandemic that Never Should Have Happened
- Pharma’s Post-Pandemic Policy Outlook
- Keeping Hope Alive
- Real Herd Immunity
- The Fiction of College Sports Amateurism
- Mac Summit: Crisis Communications in a Post-Covid, Post-Election World
- Travel Industry Communications in the Age of Covid-19
- Track of Time
- Is C-19 Taking Women Lawyers’ Careers Back to the 1950s?
- Post-Pandemic PR Strategy
- In Memoriam
- Snider’s Super Foods: Locally World Famous
- Speak Truth With Love, Not Anger
- In Memoriam: Stephen Susman
- Letter to the Movement
- John Lewis’ Life Bridged the Best of America
- Albert Krieger, 1923-2020
- In Memoriam of Marcia Horowitz
- Jim Lehrer Passes Away
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Harold Burson Passes Away
- Interviews
- CommPRO: Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s Life & Legacy
- Richard Levick on “My Wakeup Call”
- Primerus Webinar: Into the Wind
- The Future of Baseball Post-Pandemic
- Webinar: The End of Brand Neutrality
- Thought Leadership & Organic Growth
- Man & Superman
- LEVICK Announces New Webinar Series with Turbine Labs
- Navigating Coronavirus Challenges in the Insurance Industry
- VIDEO: How to Anticipate & Avoid a Crisis
- What’s Next? with Julie Chase
- What’s Next?: California Electoral Behavior
- Law Firms
- Litigators: Your Friend for Hire
- Digital Upskilling in Legal: More Than Just New Technology
- An Insider’s View of the Legal World
- Fighting for the Rule of Law with Marshall Harris
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Beyond Black Swan: Positioning the law firm for the new normal
- A Salute to Personal Courage and the Rule of Law
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- When a client becomes a law firm’s PR nightmare
- The General Counsel’s Dilemma
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- Litigation
- Litigators: Your Friend for Hire
- An Insider’s View of the Legal World
- Buyers’ Guide to In-House Tech
- Fighting for the Rule of Law with Marshall Harris
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- A Conversation with Abbe Lowell
- Leveraging Legal Expertise in Communications
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Beyond Black Swan: Positioning the law firm for the new normal
- A Salute to Personal Courage and the Rule of Law
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- When a client becomes a law firm’s PR nightmare
- Our Work
- Bridging the “Preclinical Gap” in Childhood Cancer Research
- Recent Awards & Recognition
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- Crisis Communications & The Age of Cancel Culture
- Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
- Video: Conversations with American Legends
- Staying Ahead of the Crisis
- A New Era of Insurance Marketing
- Infographic: Judgment Free Zone
- Infographic: Barriers to Entry
- Infographic: History Meter
- Assistance for Law Firms Engaged in Pro Bono
- Public Affairs
- You’re the Media and You’re Going to Die
- The Politics Industry
- The Politics Industry with Katherine Gehl
- Real Washington with Former White House Press Secretary Joe Lockhart
- From Shareholders to Stakeholders with Don Springer
- The Regulatory Hall of Fame
- Richard Levick on U.S.-China Relations
- The Price of Courage
- Can Capitalism Really Be “For Humanity?”
- GameStop: The Buck Starts Here
- Impeach, Indict, Heal? A Discussion of Post-Trump Washington
- “Crooked Dominion Machines,” Impeachments, Insurrections & The First 100 Days
- Risk
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- The Price of Courage
- Ingredients of Decency
- ESG Performance and Credit Markets
- The Coronavirus Saga is Just Beginning
- No. 1 Risk of the Decade
- The Risk Evolution of Corporate Risk
- Extend Risk Management Reach
- Collective Action
- Risk Identifying Software
- The New Risk of Doing Nothing
- Political Unrest In Hong Kong
- Social
- A Call for Elected Officials to Protect Voting Access
- How America Scores Changes Youths Through Soccer and Poetry
- Look
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- The Price of Courage
- Bridging the “Preclinical Gap” in Childhood Cancer Research
- The Ministry of Common Sense
- How to Stop the Madness
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- No ‘justice’ in rep’s vote
- A Call for Orderly & Peaceful Transition of Power
- Recovering from the Greatest Sacrifice
- Technology
- Digital Upskilling in Legal: More Than Just New Technology
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- Bridging the “Preclinical Gap” in Childhood Cancer Research
- 3 Tech Lessons Businesses Must Learn From COVID-19
- Constella Intelligence Announces Hunter for Improved Investigation Capability
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- Digital Politics: The Future of Voting Technology
- Ethics in Electronics
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- The Pause
- Cybersecurity Incidents of the Summer
- This Week
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- A New Year’s Resolution
- Over the River and Through The Woods
- Dropping the Mic
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- What We Hear
- Track of Time
- Video: Conversations with American Legends
- Conversations with American Legends
- A New Era of Insurance Marketing
- American Legend