Robert Gemmill | March 8th, 2018
Cryptocurrency and Transparency: An Oxymoron?

As the cryptocurrency market continues to grow amidst ever-volatile price swings, attorneys and facilitators of the transactions known as “initial coin offerings†(ICOs) are a new target for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). SEC Chairman Jay Clayton is warning so-called “crypto lawyers†that those circumventing federal securities laws could face disbarment or worse. Clayton has instructed SEC staff to be vigilant in addressing legal approaches to ICOs that do not comply with securities laws and the professional obligations of the U.S. securities bar.
The massive expansion of cryptocurrencies has provided a new market – and potential pitfalls – for attorneys. Crypto lawyers and blockchain practices are in high demand due not only to the popularity of cryptocurrency but because of the ambiguity of the industry. As of now, the rules and regulations regarding the exchanges and investments of digital “tokens†are vague – leaving plenty of space for error, intentional or not.
The primary issue perplexing lawmakers and the crypto industry is whether or not ICOs are legally defined as “securities†in the framework of the Securities Act of 1933. The Securities Act was created following the crash of 1929 to protect investors. Using the Supreme Court™’s Howey Test, one can determine if certain transactions qualify as “investment contracts.†Those that do are considered securities under the Securities Act.
The statute™’s framework requires issuers and sellers of securities to provide investors with the information necessary to make well-informed investment decisions. The Act also prohibits the sale of a security unless it is registered with the SEC. Â
 If the following requirements are met, a transaction will be considered a security:
1.      “It is an investment of money;
2. Â Â Â Â Â Â There is an expectation of profits from the investment;
3. Â Â Â Â Â Â The investment of money is in a common enterprise;
4.       Any profit comes from the efforts of a promoter or third party.â€
 Note that although “money†is used, the Howey Test has been expanded to include other assets.
According to the SEC, based on the test, one should assume that ICOs are “securities.†However, to avoid falling prey to the Howey test, cryptocurrencies can be (and often are) decentralized. In other words, cash with no owner or development team, and therefore, no expectation that a company may profit. For example, the transaction of Bitcoin has not been registered with the SEC, because currently, no one has been identified as responsible for the registration process.
 The lack of clear legislation allows ICOs to function without regulation, putting crypto lawyers and investors in a vulnerable position.
Clayton stated in his warning to crypto lawyers that when counseling clients on the status of an ICO, some “appear to provide the ‘it depends’ equivocal advice, rather than counseling their clients that the product they are promoting likely is a security.†Â
To improve the circumstances for attorneys and investors alike, crypto lawyers would benefit from improved transparency in the cryptocurrency market. Sage communications advice and a strategy that supports legal counsel can help merge the seemingly competing interests of cryptocurrency and transparency. After all, part of the appeal of cryptocurrency is in its anonymity and ambiguity.
 A proactive approach includes assisting crypto lawyers as they work with their clients and lawmakers to develop a solid legal foundation and set of regulations for the cryptocurrency market – while also managing the client™’s reputational risk through the process. Improving transparency does not mean giving up the very ideals that make cryptocurrency so revolutionary. It simply means correcting the misunderstandings about cryptocurrency and doing so on your own terms – not that of a regulator or litigator. Being proactively transparent will protect cryptocurrency™’s appeal, not harm it.
The prosperity of the cryptocurrency market will increase the need for more advisors and legal counsel. A transparent and more proactive approach could settle the SEC, inform the general public, and reassure investors. Attorneys who take the necessary steps to clearly communicate externally during this uncertain period will have a jump start on defining their role or specialty in the cryptocurrency market. They will also be protecting their clients in the court of public opinion, before any further regulation or litigation.
As it stands, crypto lawyers and their clients risk being at the mercy of an uninformed narrative.
LEVICK Fellow Caroline Beckmann contributed to this post.
Robert Gemmill | March 8th, 2018
Cryptocurrency and Transparency: An Oxymoron?

As the cryptocurrency market continues to grow amidst ever-volatile price swings, attorneys and facilitators of the transactions known as “initial coin offerings†(ICOs) are a new target for the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). SEC Chairman Jay Clayton is warning so-called “crypto lawyers†that those circumventing federal securities laws could face disbarment or worse. Clayton has instructed SEC staff to be vigilant in addressing legal approaches to ICOs that do not comply with securities laws and the professional obligations of the U.S. securities bar.
The massive expansion of cryptocurrencies has provided a new market – and potential pitfalls – for attorneys. Crypto lawyers and blockchain practices are in high demand due not only to the popularity of cryptocurrency but because of the ambiguity of the industry. As of now, the rules and regulations regarding the exchanges and investments of digital “tokens†are vague – leaving plenty of space for error, intentional or not.
The primary issue perplexing lawmakers and the crypto industry is whether or not ICOs are legally defined as “securities†in the framework of the Securities Act of 1933. The Securities Act was created following the crash of 1929 to protect investors. Using the Supreme Court™’s Howey Test, one can determine if certain transactions qualify as “investment contracts.†Those that do are considered securities under the Securities Act.
The statute™’s framework requires issuers and sellers of securities to provide investors with the information necessary to make well-informed investment decisions. The Act also prohibits the sale of a security unless it is registered with the SEC. Â
 If the following requirements are met, a transaction will be considered a security:
1.      “It is an investment of money;
2. Â Â Â Â Â Â There is an expectation of profits from the investment;
3. Â Â Â Â Â Â The investment of money is in a common enterprise;
4.       Any profit comes from the efforts of a promoter or third party.â€
 Note that although “money†is used, the Howey Test has been expanded to include other assets.
According to the SEC, based on the test, one should assume that ICOs are “securities.†However, to avoid falling prey to the Howey test, cryptocurrencies can be (and often are) decentralized. In other words, cash with no owner or development team, and therefore, no expectation that a company may profit. For example, the transaction of Bitcoin has not been registered with the SEC, because currently, no one has been identified as responsible for the registration process.
 The lack of clear legislation allows ICOs to function without regulation, putting crypto lawyers and investors in a vulnerable position.
Clayton stated in his warning to crypto lawyers that when counseling clients on the status of an ICO, some “appear to provide the ‘it depends’ equivocal advice, rather than counseling their clients that the product they are promoting likely is a security.†Â
To improve the circumstances for attorneys and investors alike, crypto lawyers would benefit from improved transparency in the cryptocurrency market. Sage communications advice and a strategy that supports legal counsel can help merge the seemingly competing interests of cryptocurrency and transparency. After all, part of the appeal of cryptocurrency is in its anonymity and ambiguity.
 A proactive approach includes assisting crypto lawyers as they work with their clients and lawmakers to develop a solid legal foundation and set of regulations for the cryptocurrency market – while also managing the client™’s reputational risk through the process. Improving transparency does not mean giving up the very ideals that make cryptocurrency so revolutionary. It simply means correcting the misunderstandings about cryptocurrency and doing so on your own terms – not that of a regulator or litigator. Being proactively transparent will protect cryptocurrency™’s appeal, not harm it.
The prosperity of the cryptocurrency market will increase the need for more advisors and legal counsel. A transparent and more proactive approach could settle the SEC, inform the general public, and reassure investors. Attorneys who take the necessary steps to clearly communicate externally during this uncertain period will have a jump start on defining their role or specialty in the cryptocurrency market. They will also be protecting their clients in the court of public opinion, before any further regulation or litigation.
As it stands, crypto lawyers and their clients risk being at the mercy of an uninformed narrative.
LEVICK Fellow Caroline Beckmann contributed to this post.
- Brand
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- Here We Come
- Corporate Revolt Over Campaign Donations Shakes Political World
- What Happens Next?
- CSR & Sustainability
- Public Perception & the Biden Transition
- WATCH: Reputation Management with PRSA
- Over the River and Through The Woods
- Why Non-Profits are so Vulnerable to Crisis Risk
- The Threat to Free Markets
- What Happens When Nonprofits Get Caught In The Klieg Lights?
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Communications
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- Here We Come
- The Ministry of Common Sense
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- What Happens Next?
- CSR & Sustainability
- A Conversation with Abbe Lowell
- A New Year’s Resolution
- Public Perception & the Biden Transition
- WATCH: Reputation Management with PRSA
- Leveraging Legal Expertise in Communications
- Over the River and Through The Woods
- Company News
- Here We Come
- Recent Awards & Recognition
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- What’s a Director to Do?
- LEVICK Announces Partnership with BCG
- A New Look
- Albert Krieger, 1923-2020
- LEVICK Announces Partnership with Jipyong
- Speaking to In-House Counsel
- Childhood Lessons
- LEVICK Announces New Webinar Series with Turbine Labs
- LEVICK Launches New Website
- Crisis
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- What to expect as the clock approaches midnight
- How to Stop the Madness
- Corporate Revolt Over Campaign Donations Shakes Political World
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- No ‘justice’ in rep’s vote
- A Call for Orderly & Peaceful Transition of Power
- Recovering from the Greatest Sacrifice
- The Cost of Government Regulation and the Threat to Free Enterprise
- What Happens Next?
- A Conversation with Abbe Lowell
- Covid-19: The Pandemic that Never Should Have Happened
- Finance
- Here We Come
- The Threat to Free Markets
- Advisory & Insurance Services
- WATCH: Revolutionizing Litigation Finance
- Litigation Finance: Revolutionizing Litigation
- Consumer-Focused Solutions for Financial Health
- Event: Consumer-Focused Solutions for Financial Health
- Sports: Power and Money in a New Age of Social Justice
- The Balancing Act: The Role of Whistleblowers in American Commerce and Government
- The Evolving and More Powerful FARA
- FCPA & Compliance in a Time of Uncertainty
- Shareholders vs. Stakeholders: Is the Paradigm Shifting?
- Guest Column
- Guest Blog: The Mainstream Media Gets an A for Intellectual Arrogance, an F for Journalism
- Buckle up Directors: Cybersecurity Risk and Bankruptcy Risk Are Not Mutually Exclusive
- Buckle up Directors: Cybersecurity Risk and Bankruptcy Risk Are Not Mutually Exclusive
- South Africa: The Slow Decline of the ANC
- Why CSR Fails and How to Fix It
- What to Expect Following the European Elections?
- Buhari Inaugurated. What Now for Nigeria?
- Marketing- It’s Up To You…
- Crisis Management lessons from the air-crash investigation model
- The Future of War
- Health
- Food Issues & the Biden Administration
- Covid-19: The Pandemic that Never Should Have Happened
- Pharma’s Post-Pandemic Policy Outlook
- Keeping Hope Alive
- Real Herd Immunity
- The Fiction of College Sports Amateurism
- Mac Summit: Crisis Communications in a Post-Covid, Post-Election World
- Travel Industry Communications in the Age of Covid-19
- Track of Time
- Is C-19 Taking Women Lawyers’ Careers Back to the 1950s?
- Post-Pandemic PR Strategy
- Bankruptcy: A Culture of Transparency
- In Memoriam
- Snider’s Super Foods: Locally World Famous
- Speak Truth With Love, Not Anger
- In Memoriam: Stephen Susman
- Letter to the Movement
- John Lewis’ Life Bridged the Best of America
- Albert Krieger, 1923-2020
- In Memoriam of Marcia Horowitz
- Jim Lehrer Passes Away
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Harold Burson Passes Away
- Interviews
- CommPRO: Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s Life & Legacy
- Richard Levick on “My Wakeup Call”
- Primerus Webinar: Into the Wind
- The Future of Baseball Post-Pandemic
- Webinar: The End of Brand Neutrality
- Thought Leadership & Organic Growth
- Man & Superman
- LEVICK Announces New Webinar Series with Turbine Labs
- Navigating Coronavirus Challenges in the Insurance Industry
- VIDEO: How to Anticipate & Avoid a Crisis
- What’s Next? with Julie Chase
- What’s Next?: California Electoral Behavior
- Law Firms
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Beyond Black Swan: Positioning the law firm for the new normal
- A Salute to Personal Courage and the Rule of Law
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- When a client becomes a law firm’s PR nightmare
- The General Counsel’s Dilemma
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- The Latest Top Class Actions
- Trust on Trial: How Communicators Succeed in a World No Longer Trusted
- The Latest Settlements, Class actions, Investigations & More
- Managing Legal & Communication Advice in a Crisis
- Litigation
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- A Conversation with Abbe Lowell
- Leveraging Legal Expertise in Communications
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Beyond Black Swan: Positioning the law firm for the new normal
- A Salute to Personal Courage and the Rule of Law
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- When a client becomes a law firm’s PR nightmare
- The General Counsel’s Dilemma
- WATCH: Revolutionizing Litigation Finance
- Litigation Finance: Revolutionizing Litigation
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- Our Work
- Recent Awards & Recognition
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- Crisis Communications & The Age of Cancel Culture
- Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
- Video: Conversations with American Legends
- Staying Ahead of the Crisis
- A New Era of Insurance Marketing
- Infographic: Judgment Free Zone
- Infographic: Barriers to Entry
- Infographic: History Meter
- Assistance for Law Firms Engaged in Pro Bono
- Webinar: The End of Brand Neutrality
- Public Affairs
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- What to expect as the clock approaches midnight
- How to Stop the Madness
- Corporate Revolt Over Campaign Donations Shakes Political World
- No ‘justice’ in rep’s vote
- A Call for Orderly & Peaceful Transition of Power
- Recovering from the Greatest Sacrifice
- Food Issues & the Biden Administration
- The Cost of Government Regulation and the Threat to Free Enterprise
- What Happens Next?
- CSR & Sustainability
- A Conversation with Abbe Lowell
- Risk
- Ingredients of Decency
- ESG Performance and Credit Markets
- The Coronavirus Saga is Just Beginning
- No. 1 Risk of the Decade
- The Risk Evolution of Corporate Risk
- Extend Risk Management Reach
- Collective Action
- Risk Identifying Software
- The New Risk of Doing Nothing
- Political Unrest In Hong Kong
- High-Profile Kidnaps in African National Parks
- Cyber Resilience
- Social
- The Ministry of Common Sense
- How to Stop the Madness
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- No ‘justice’ in rep’s vote
- A Call for Orderly & Peaceful Transition of Power
- Recovering from the Greatest Sacrifice
- CSR & Sustainability
- A New Year’s Resolution
- Dropping the Mic
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- Crisis, Covid, DEI & the Election
- MLK’s Memphis Address
- Technology
- Constella Intelligence Announces Hunter for Improved Investigation Capability
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- Digital Politics: The Future of Voting Technology
- Ethics in Electronics
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- The Pause
- Cybersecurity Incidents of the Summer
- The Changing Digital Economy and Cyber Risks
- The Future of U.S. Manufacturing
- Tech CEO Summer Superbowl hearing
- Technology & Privacy Alert
- This Week
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- A New Year’s Resolution
- Over the River and Through The Woods
- Dropping the Mic
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- What We Hear
- Track of Time
- Video: Conversations with American Legends
- Conversations with American Legends
- A New Era of Insurance Marketing
- American Legend