Dan Rene | August 2nd, 2016
Marissa Mayer and a Broken Chain of Communications

Update:Â After further investigation, and talking with communicators at Yahoo, it became clear that the news articles circulating were lacking some of the facts that were happening behind closed doors at Yahoo.Â
The original email sent internally subjected Mayer and the content of her message to extreme criticism. While it was noted that Mayer did not establish a forum allowing for questions and concerns by employees, it was revealed that there was an element of transparency amongst all employees, as they had a meeting following the receipt of her email, where questions and concerns were encouraged. In addition to that one meeting post-email, Yahoo was hosting weekly meetings where topics and questions were addressed.
Imagine being stuck in a multi-day long game of “telephone.†That is the reality for the nearly 9,000 employees of Yahoo who are uncertain of their future with Yahoo ever since Verizon and AOL acquired the company on Monday morning for $4.83 billion.
The first person to start the game of telephone was Yahoo™’s CEO Marissa Mayer. On Monday morning, she sent an email to all of her employees confirming Verizon™’s purchase and declaring her intentions to remain with Yahoo. Mayer left employees with mixed sentiments after saying comments such as “For me personally, I’m planning to stay. I love Yahoo, and I believe in all of you.†However, she made no indication on what the employees’, who transformed, shifted and grew the company, would have in store for their future. Additionally, she left no room for employees’ comments or questions, and gave them no outlet to express any of their concerns.
Her “employee communication†could be described as selfish – it completely failed to resonate with the audience it was meant to inspire.
Effective communicators are generous and realize their audience is constantly asking “why do I care†and “what™’s in it for me?â€
The next chain in the game of telephone was introduced when Tim Armstrong, the CEO of AOL, told the public that scale was imperative. With most acquisitions, scaling is expected, along with cost-saving synergies. “Synergies†can be an unnerving word for employees of both acquirers and acquisition targets because it almost always involves the closing and combining of offices, which also means the reduction of headcount. Armstrong was clear with saying that there is no set structure, and Mayer™’s position is not guaranteed.
The rank and file employee wants to know how this impacts them – rarely do they care about the CEO™’s job security when their own is in question.
The third chain that entered the game was the numerous anonymous sources, including current and former Yahoo executives, who claim Mayer will only be included in the transition, but will hold no position once the transition is complete—“it appears likely that Verizon will fire her once the deal is closed.†A majority of her current board members are not fond of Mayer, and Mayer held an alarmingly low approval rating of 66%–nearly one-third lower than Yahoo™’s top competitors, including Apple, Google, and Facebook.
With all three chains interfering with the direct line of communication between Mayer, the employees, and the public, Mayer should have established a much clearer plan of action for accurately relaying the message in a way that actually addresses audience concerns.
Just like any other acquired or transitioning company, it should have been clear to Mayer to have had an established employee communications – not just a pep rally letter. Instead of addressing her own concerns about her place within the company first, she should have been transparent about what was and what was not expected from employees and what they may expect in the transition.
There also was no designated communications team. At the bottom of her email, Mayer should have listed personnel, email addresses and phone numbers for any employees to contact to ask questions.
Mayer should also have created a communications plan with Armstrong and Marni Walden, Verizon™’s executive vice president, to ensure that they weren’t sending mixed messages. Consistency of message is of paramount importance – but the message also must be clear and address the audience where they are – not where we want them to be.
Mayer™’s statement said she was staying with Yahoo, Armstrong™’s statement said that scale is imperative, and Walden™’s task is to determine if Mayer will stay with the company. With three completely differentiating statements circulating throughout the public, the employees have every right to be, and surely are, concerned, confused, and frustrated.
LEVICK Intern Carly Berkenblit contributed to this post.Â
Dan Rene | August 2nd, 2016
Marissa Mayer and a Broken Chain of Communications

Update:Â After further investigation, and talking with communicators at Yahoo, it became clear that the news articles circulating were lacking some of the facts that were happening behind closed doors at Yahoo.Â
The original email sent internally subjected Mayer and the content of her message to extreme criticism. While it was noted that Mayer did not establish a forum allowing for questions and concerns by employees, it was revealed that there was an element of transparency amongst all employees, as they had a meeting following the receipt of her email, where questions and concerns were encouraged. In addition to that one meeting post-email, Yahoo was hosting weekly meetings where topics and questions were addressed.
Imagine being stuck in a multi-day long game of “telephone.†That is the reality for the nearly 9,000 employees of Yahoo who are uncertain of their future with Yahoo ever since Verizon and AOL acquired the company on Monday morning for $4.83 billion.
The first person to start the game of telephone was Yahoo™’s CEO Marissa Mayer. On Monday morning, she sent an email to all of her employees confirming Verizon™’s purchase and declaring her intentions to remain with Yahoo. Mayer left employees with mixed sentiments after saying comments such as “For me personally, I’m planning to stay. I love Yahoo, and I believe in all of you.†However, she made no indication on what the employees’, who transformed, shifted and grew the company, would have in store for their future. Additionally, she left no room for employees’ comments or questions, and gave them no outlet to express any of their concerns.
Her “employee communication†could be described as selfish – it completely failed to resonate with the audience it was meant to inspire.
Effective communicators are generous and realize their audience is constantly asking “why do I care†and “what™’s in it for me?â€
The next chain in the game of telephone was introduced when Tim Armstrong, the CEO of AOL, told the public that scale was imperative. With most acquisitions, scaling is expected, along with cost-saving synergies. “Synergies†can be an unnerving word for employees of both acquirers and acquisition targets because it almost always involves the closing and combining of offices, which also means the reduction of headcount. Armstrong was clear with saying that there is no set structure, and Mayer™’s position is not guaranteed.
The rank and file employee wants to know how this impacts them – rarely do they care about the CEO™’s job security when their own is in question.
The third chain that entered the game was the numerous anonymous sources, including current and former Yahoo executives, who claim Mayer will only be included in the transition, but will hold no position once the transition is complete—“it appears likely that Verizon will fire her once the deal is closed.†A majority of her current board members are not fond of Mayer, and Mayer held an alarmingly low approval rating of 66%–nearly one-third lower than Yahoo™’s top competitors, including Apple, Google, and Facebook.
With all three chains interfering with the direct line of communication between Mayer, the employees, and the public, Mayer should have established a much clearer plan of action for accurately relaying the message in a way that actually addresses audience concerns.
Just like any other acquired or transitioning company, it should have been clear to Mayer to have had an established employee communications – not just a pep rally letter. Instead of addressing her own concerns about her place within the company first, she should have been transparent about what was and what was not expected from employees and what they may expect in the transition.
There also was no designated communications team. At the bottom of her email, Mayer should have listed personnel, email addresses and phone numbers for any employees to contact to ask questions.
Mayer should also have created a communications plan with Armstrong and Marni Walden, Verizon™’s executive vice president, to ensure that they weren’t sending mixed messages. Consistency of message is of paramount importance – but the message also must be clear and address the audience where they are – not where we want them to be.
Mayer™’s statement said she was staying with Yahoo, Armstrong™’s statement said that scale is imperative, and Walden™’s task is to determine if Mayer will stay with the company. With three completely differentiating statements circulating throughout the public, the employees have every right to be, and surely are, concerned, confused, and frustrated.
LEVICK Intern Carly Berkenblit contributed to this post.Â
- Brand
- Meet Nancy Pelosi
- Delta Airlines and the Georgia Voting Controversy
- Richard Levick on Volkswagen’s April Fool’s
- The Final Episode of M*A*S*H
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- Can Capitalism Really Be “For Humanity?”
- The Fifth Estate: A Business Guide for Surviving “The Troubles”
- Here We Come
- Corporate Revolt Over Campaign Donations Shakes Political World
- What Happens Next?
- CSR & Sustainability
- Public Perception & the Biden Transition
- Communications
- Corporate Leadership in an Age of Unrest
- Ten Rules For Corporations And Social Issues
- Delta Airlines and the Georgia Voting Controversy
- Developing a Crisis Management Program
- “I Never Felt as Unsafe as I Did That Day”
- How America Scores Changes Youths Through Soccer and Poetry
- Everyone Gets Disrupted
- The Politics Industry
- Look
- The Final Episode of M*A*S*H
- The Regulatory Hall of Fame
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- Company News
- The Final Episode of M*A*S*H
- Reflections on a Turbulent Year: 2020
- Here We Come
- Recent Awards & Recognition
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- What’s a Director to Do?
- LEVICK Announces Partnership with BCG
- A New Look
- Albert Krieger, 1923-2020
- LEVICK Announces Partnership with Jipyong
- Speaking to In-House Counsel
- Childhood Lessons
- Crisis
- Corporate Leadership in an Age of Unrest
- Ten Rules For Corporations And Social Issues
- Meet Nancy Pelosi
- It’s War: The New Dilemma for Corporations and Social Issues
- Matt Gaetz’s Strategic Struggle Makes Him a Target
- Delta Airlines and the Georgia Voting Controversy
- A Call for Elected Officials to Protect Voting Access
- Richard Levick on Volkswagen’s April Fool’s
- Developing a Crisis Management Program
- Standing In Awe
- “I Never Felt as Unsafe as I Did That Day”
- Richard Levick on Top 2020 Crises
- Finance
- The World of Financial Crimes with Tom Ajamie
- Can Capitalism Really Be “For Humanity?”
- GameStop: The Buck Starts Here
- Here We Come
- The Threat to Free Markets
- Advisory & Insurance Services
- WATCH: Revolutionizing Litigation Finance
- Litigation Finance: Revolutionizing Litigation
- Consumer-Focused Solutions for Financial Health
- Event: Consumer-Focused Solutions for Financial Health
- Sports: Power and Money in a New Age of Social Justice
- The Balancing Act: The Role of Whistleblowers in American Commerce and Government
- Guest Column
- Guest Blog: The Mainstream Media Gets an A for Intellectual Arrogance, an F for Journalism
- Buckle up Directors: Cybersecurity Risk and Bankruptcy Risk Are Not Mutually Exclusive
- Buckle up Directors: Cybersecurity Risk and Bankruptcy Risk Are Not Mutually Exclusive
- South Africa: The Slow Decline of the ANC
- Why CSR Fails and How to Fix It
- What to Expect Following the European Elections?
- Buhari Inaugurated. What Now for Nigeria?
- Marketing- It’s Up To You…
- Crisis Management lessons from the air-crash investigation model
- The Future of War
- Health
- Reflections on a Turbulent Year: 2020
- Food Issues & the Biden Administration
- Covid-19: The Pandemic that Never Should Have Happened
- Pharma’s Post-Pandemic Policy Outlook
- Keeping Hope Alive
- Real Herd Immunity
- The Fiction of College Sports Amateurism
- Mac Summit: Crisis Communications in a Post-Covid, Post-Election World
- Travel Industry Communications in the Age of Covid-19
- Track of Time
- Is C-19 Taking Women Lawyers’ Careers Back to the 1950s?
- Post-Pandemic PR Strategy
- In Memoriam
- Snider’s Super Foods: Locally World Famous
- Speak Truth With Love, Not Anger
- In Memoriam: Stephen Susman
- Letter to the Movement
- John Lewis’ Life Bridged the Best of America
- Albert Krieger, 1923-2020
- In Memoriam of Marcia Horowitz
- Jim Lehrer Passes Away
- Martin Luther King, Jr.
- Harold Burson Passes Away
- Interviews
- CommPRO: Ruth Bader Ginsberg’s Life & Legacy
- Richard Levick on “My Wakeup Call”
- Primerus Webinar: Into the Wind
- The Future of Baseball Post-Pandemic
- Webinar: The End of Brand Neutrality
- Thought Leadership & Organic Growth
- Man & Superman
- LEVICK Announces New Webinar Series with Turbine Labs
- Navigating Coronavirus Challenges in the Insurance Industry
- VIDEO: How to Anticipate & Avoid a Crisis
- What’s Next? with Julie Chase
- What’s Next?: California Electoral Behavior
- Law Firms
- Digital Upskilling in Legal: More Than Just New Technology
- An Insider’s View of the Legal World
- Fighting for the Rule of Law with Marshall Harris
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Beyond Black Swan: Positioning the law firm for the new normal
- A Salute to Personal Courage and the Rule of Law
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- When a client becomes a law firm’s PR nightmare
- The General Counsel’s Dilemma
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- The Latest Top Class Actions
- Litigation
- An Insider’s View of the Legal World
- Buyers’ Guide to In-House Tech
- Fighting for the Rule of Law with Marshall Harris
- Why Should I Apologize? Lawyers vs. Communicators
- A Conversation with Abbe Lowell
- Leveraging Legal Expertise in Communications
- You Took a PPP Loan. Now Get Ready to Talk About It.
- Beyond Black Swan: Positioning the law firm for the new normal
- A Salute to Personal Courage and the Rule of Law
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- When a client becomes a law firm’s PR nightmare
- The General Counsel’s Dilemma
- Our Work
- Bridging the “Preclinical Gap” in Childhood Cancer Research
- Recent Awards & Recognition
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- Crisis Communications & The Age of Cancel Culture
- Standing on the Shoulders of Giants
- Video: Conversations with American Legends
- Staying Ahead of the Crisis
- A New Era of Insurance Marketing
- Infographic: Judgment Free Zone
- Infographic: Barriers to Entry
- Infographic: History Meter
- Assistance for Law Firms Engaged in Pro Bono
- Public Affairs
- You’re the Media and You’re Going to Die
- The Politics Industry
- The Politics Industry with Katherine Gehl
- Real Washington with Former White House Press Secretary Joe Lockhart
- From Shareholders to Stakeholders with Don Springer
- The Regulatory Hall of Fame
- Richard Levick on U.S.-China Relations
- The Price of Courage
- Can Capitalism Really Be “For Humanity?”
- GameStop: The Buck Starts Here
- Impeach, Indict, Heal? A Discussion of Post-Trump Washington
- “Crooked Dominion Machines,” Impeachments, Insurrections & The First 100 Days
- Risk
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- The Price of Courage
- Ingredients of Decency
- ESG Performance and Credit Markets
- The Coronavirus Saga is Just Beginning
- No. 1 Risk of the Decade
- The Risk Evolution of Corporate Risk
- Extend Risk Management Reach
- Collective Action
- Risk Identifying Software
- The New Risk of Doing Nothing
- Political Unrest In Hong Kong
- Social
- A Call for Elected Officials to Protect Voting Access
- How America Scores Changes Youths Through Soccer and Poetry
- Look
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- The Price of Courage
- Bridging the “Preclinical Gap” in Childhood Cancer Research
- The Ministry of Common Sense
- How to Stop the Madness
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- No ‘justice’ in rep’s vote
- A Call for Orderly & Peaceful Transition of Power
- Recovering from the Greatest Sacrifice
- Technology
- Digital Upskilling in Legal: More Than Just New Technology
- Should Companies Consider Appointing Chief Paranoia Officers to Combat Disinformation?
- Bridging the “Preclinical Gap” in Childhood Cancer Research
- 3 Tech Lessons Businesses Must Learn From COVID-19
- Constella Intelligence Announces Hunter for Improved Investigation Capability
- Cyber Risk Institute Expands Its Profile
- Digital Politics: The Future of Voting Technology
- Ethics in Electronics
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- A First Look at the Google Antitrust Suit
- The Pause
- Cybersecurity Incidents of the Summer
- This Week
- A Remembrance of Tommy Raskin
- A New Year’s Resolution
- Over the River and Through The Woods
- Dropping the Mic
- Won’t You Be My Neighbor?
- The Cyber Bad Guys Are Getting Worse
- What We Hear
- Track of Time
- Video: Conversations with American Legends
- Conversations with American Legends
- A New Era of Insurance Marketing
- American Legend